MOST PASSIONATE DELEGATE OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY 3RD COMMITTEE.

Yup,title says it all.

MYMUN PART 1

Okay,I shall now talk abt my three days in MYMUN(don't mind me if I brag.)





A little elaboration abt what we Mymuners do.





Malaysian Model United Nations(MyMun)Notice the 'Model'?That means we're debating UN style.





Our purpose.


To write our own resolution(resolutions are like lists of solutions to resolve an issue)that will resolve the matter of,for example but not limited to,The measure to improve the rights of the Tibetans.In resolutions,there are lists of solutions.Those are called clauses.Clauses in a resolution will sometimes have loopholes(Loopholes are errors in a clause that will not resolve the issue).Thus,we have amendments(notice the word mend?It's like fixing.Yeah,fix.)We make amendments to improve resolutions to their best conditions.Now,Point Of Informaiton.It can be used to question people when you think their information is wrong so like yeah,to point out their mistakes.At the end of the debate after it is corrected to it's full potential,the reso is voted upon whether to pass or fail.

My country.

First Day,





Good,good.Our resolution was so good that it was barely debatable.We debate to correct it and it was obviously too good to correct.I loved our gangs reso^^





Second Day,





As reported in MyMun newspaper,''Measures to improve the rights of the Tibetans were touched upon equally,the latter caused quite a stir among the delegates.IN FACT,AT ONE POINT ITALY VERBALLY ATTACKED CHINA,EXPRESSING HER SUPPORT FOR THE DALAI LAMA.Mmmhhmm,Italy,that was me.I wonder if I can scan the newspaper...





Me:As stated in clause 3,''Decides to invite the Dalai Lama back to China with open arms''.Sure,China will let the Dalai Lama come back but what about the Panchen Lama?The second most important spiritual leader to the Tibetans.Does the delegate of China agree with the delegate of Italy that China deliberately abducted the Panchen Lama(he's just 6.Now,17) and his holiness' family .His Holiness has not been found hitherto.Thus,the delegate of Italy would like to know whether China will release the 11th Panchen Lama with his family.





China:*Speechless for awhile*The delegate of China would like to state that there has been no solid evidence that the Panchen Lama has been captured by the Chinese government.





Italy:*makes sarcastic snicker,no,I didn't overdo it*Is the delegate of China aware that this fact s stated in www.phayul .com. and various other sources media sources.So is this considered not solid proof?This shows that the delegate of China hasn't been doing a proper research.





China*feels insulted*Well,the delegate of China feels that medias are constantly bias towards this issue.Therefore,this fact is most likely exaggerated.





-ten minutes later during break time-





Chair:Hey Italy,what you said abt the Panchen Lama was rlly cool abt him getting abducted and all.





Me:I know^^They also went and replaced their spiritual leader with some other guy.That was against Tibet's wishes therefore it was against religious rights.





Bottomline,Italy won cuz China insulted the chair and her facts were wrong in the first place.



POIed a lot.I just love pointting out mistakes.



Third day,



Debated on two resos.POIed people like shit again.Thus,Making their amendments fail so yeah they became wary of me because of that.Then,people started coming up to me to read their amendments and asked me to correct their amendments for them.There were like 4 coming up to me at once.



Me:*tells them abt how it's vague/ambiguous and questionableHey,Slovakia,why are you asking me to correct your amendment(It was kinda stupid in the first place so I did correct it)

Slovakia:Because,I don't want you to POI me later.You're like one of those people who always like pointing out mistakes.

Me:Oooohhh...really?That's nice to know^^

Damn,that felt good.

Later that day,

We went to the auditorium for the closing ceremony(I forgot to state that the opening one was damn chio).In the closing ceremony,the chairs of each committee will award three people from each committee which consists of about 20 people on average with three coveted awards.

MOST PASSIONATE DELEGATE.

(This delegate has contributed the most enthusiasm in the debate and is very passionate about learning)

MOST DIPLOMATIC DELEGATE.

(This delegate has shown respect for other members of the floor)

AND.

MOST IMPROVED.

(This delegate has shown most outstanding improvement throughout this period of three days.)

So we're all ushered into the auditorium to like see the prize giving ceremony.

Jarrod's committee was up first,(Mind you,his speeches are damn chio)General Assembly 1st committee.

They announced the three most outstanding delegates in their committee

Most Passionate-Not him

Most Diplomatic-Not him

Most Improved-HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Expected him to get Most Diplomatic,honestly speaking.But oh well,I wasn't allowed to see his debate anyways.I had my own.

Next up was mine(I tell ya,I sincerely felt happy for Jarrod when he won but I was worried I wouldn't get anything.I'd feel sad.)

I was shockingly very calm as though I didn't care if I would get an award or not but deep down,I knew I would feel friggin' sad.

Most Passionate-MEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMMEMEMEMEMEME!YES!ME,YAU HUI MIN a/p Yau Kok Fai!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!eleventy-one111111111!!!!111111

Most Diplomatic-Panama(I don't understand why she won.I thought it would be Sierra Leone but then again,he attacked just as much as me.In panama's case,she talked damn little compared to me.Usually most diplomatic is people that talk a lot.I think she won cuz she wasn't as sarcastic as me,China and Sierra Leone.Heck,even China would've faired better.Wait,I hate China.She fakes her facts and it's not even convincing.)

Most improved-Sierra Leone-I tell you,I was damn shocked.I srsly expected him to get most diplomatic.Oh well,maybe it's because he insults people directly.People in the UN odn't do that cuz it may cause a controversy.

All in all,well,what you reap is what you sow.

I really do believe in Marcus' saying ''There's No Failure,Only Learning Experiences.

Last year,I'll admit that I only went up twice in three days.Why?Because I wasn't well informed about the procedure of the debate because of a certain someone and I feel I didn't do enough research.To me,that was failure.

But now,I have taken it as a learning experience.There's also the saying that ''You can learn something from anything. Even if u won, or lost, There is always something to learn.''Again,taken from Marcus.I really do believe in this.I might have 'won'' this year but I'm sure I still learned many new things that didn't know about before this.

Okay,I'm tired now.

My humblest apologies for any grammar mistakes.I am mentally tired now so I can't think straight.

Wake up at 6 in the morning and sleep at 12 am,three days in a row.I've been doing it.Yes,we all commonly do it on school nights but what do you do in the afternoon?Entertainment?Tv?Gaming?That relaxes your mind.We debate for six hours straight.In fact,we constantly think.Even during lunch hour.Thinking what we should say and what not.We barely even have enough time to eat.And 6 hours of grueling thinking,yeah,it hurts the brain so we're mentally tired cuz our mind never rests.

OKAY,TIRED NOW.I SHALL SLEEP SOON.CONTINUE TMR,WITH PICTURES.

FUCK.CHORAL SPEAKING TMR.I DON'T REMEMBER THE LINES.YOU DON'T EXPECT ME TO REMEMBER.I HAVE BETTER THINGS TO DO.

DON'T LAUGH AT ME TMR.

TOODLES~!